HOME
CANDIDATES
SUCCESS STORIES
TESTIMONIALS
REDUNDANCY ADVICE
CAREER PLANNING
WORKING IN ASIA
CONTRACTING
INTERNATIONAL
CLIENTS
OUR KEY DIFFERENCE
CANDIDATE SOURCING
SUCCESS STORIES
TESTIMONIALS
OUTSOURCING TO ASIA
ABOUT US
HOW WE WORK
OUR PEOPLE
LINKS
CONTACT US

Selection tests

Although selection tests are not yet the norm in Singapore and Asia, an increasing number of companies, particularly the major banks, are now using specialist tests in addition to the face-to-face interview process. It is important to be aware of what they involve.

 

The general rule is that bigger companies use tests more than smaller ones and, the higher the position, the more sophisticated and complex the testing is likely to be.

 

Three of the most common types of test are; general ability tests, personality tests and specific tests to assess skills and experience for a particular role:

 

General ability tests

 

There are a wide variety of tests that attempt to assess your general skills and intelligence against a benchmark of similarly graded employees.

 

Numerical and verbal reasoning tests are the most common and are often used by the larger banks. They are almost invariably multiple choice, such as: "What number comes after 3, 9, 27?" and can quickly become quite challenging.

 

Other tests are more sophisticated in terms of methodology, like critical reasoning tests where inferences need to be drawn from data, or diagrammatic tests of logical reasoning presented in the form of abstract shapes and diagrams.

 

Another type of test requires you to read a narrative under time pressure and answer a series of what may appear to be ambiguous questions.

 

Then come more task orientated tests, such as in and out tray exercises which expect you to react efficiently to a flow of paperwork and directives that make conflicting demands, or case studies, which may or may not have anything to do with your particular job area, but test your ability to think through and react to complex challenges.

 

Personality tests

 

Personality tests usually take the form of questionnaires, which set out to provide a profile of your personality and motivation. 

 

Personality questionnaires are easy to sit and are generally multiple choice. You tick the box that most accurately describes your preference in a given situation. They set out to identify specific personality traits (such as self assured versus apprehensive). Your results can be compared with averages taken from the general population or any selected peer group. Further analysis and other tests establish broad personality patterns.

 

A slight variation is Occupational personality questionnaires, which are designed to assess your typical or preferred behaviour as it relates to work. For example, are you orientated towards introspection or team building? It is easy to think that there are no right or wrong answers and that you can't pass or fail such tests. However, would a potential employer wish to recruit a tense and introverted person or a positive, thoughtful team player?

 

Although it may be tempting to consider giving the answer you think is wanted rather than what you really think, the tests carry warnings that suggest that if you attempt to lie in your responses, you will be found out, as your results will reveal inconsistencies and invalidate the test. In reality, it is not unreasonable to obtain examples of the commonly used tests and scoring methods, at least to help understand the potential pitfalls, as well as perhaps helping you to communicate your personality in a more desirable way.

 

Specific tests

 

Specific tests take all different forms, as they are usually generated to reflect specific companies views of the requirements of a particular role or department. Examples of such tests include:

 

1.       Presentations - often given to your potential boss or other managers. It is not unusual for a company to provide the subject of the presentation before you attend the interview.

2.       Report writing - you are given a particular business scenario and then asked to draft a report detailing, for example, salient control features or security recommendations.

3.       Role-playing - although not the most frequent type of test, role-play is occasionally used to try and gauge how you might react in a specific business situation. For example, having provided you with the relevant information, someone going for a job as a senior auditor might be asked to enact an audit closing meeting, with a member of the department's management team as the auditee.

 

All these tests are designed to provide companies with further evidence of the capabilities and potential that you have. Very often you are benchmarked not just against skills required for a position in the specific part of the company for which you are interviewing, but against a norm for a management grade. In some tests, for example verbal and numerical reasoning, there will be a minimum score, which you must exceed. Other tests provide evidence that is qualitative rather than quantitative, but are no less important in a company's decision-making process.

For more information on selection tests, please contact John Tomnay jtomnay@tomnaynoble.com.


  Keyword(s)
  
 
Outsourcing in Asia